RE: Item Master Item Types -- MAPICS-L

Thanks to all for their responses...we already use item type 9 to represent
a subtype of purchased parts, but I believe there is a 'K' i/type which we
have not used, so possibly we could utilize this i/type to make the desired
representation.

Thanks again!

Bonnie Cameron
Polaris Industries
218.463.4094

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Turbide [mailto:dave@daveturbide.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:24 PM
To: mapics-l@midrange.com
Subject: Re: Item Master Item Types


Bonnie -

Pete is right - type "9" is the safest. Types 1 and 2 are considered
manufactured and 3 & 4 are purchased - the system will restrict maintenance
of the cost fields accordingly. Type 9 is "user defined" and costing allows
more manual entries (both material and labor/overhead). Be aware that cost
roll-up will be affected if you don't change it to the proper item type
before doing a roll-up. MRP keys off the M or P in Item Balance so planning
is not a problem if you change item types later.

If you go this route, I suggest you create a query to check for type 9s
that haven't been re-defined and run it every day or two to make sure the
definition process gets completed for every item.

Dave Turbide
dave@daveturbide.com

>Bonnie,
>There is no code file containing these types. I guess it is hard coded
>in the entry/maint program.
>And you have to have one.
>You could use a "9" user option then have have a night prog. list all the
>"9" to remind you that you need to take care of at some point....
>0 Phantom
>1 Assembly or subassembly
>2 Fabricated item
>3 Raw material
>4 Purchased item
>9 User option (Special)
>F Feature
>K Kit
>Pete Olshavsky
>Ind Mapics Analyst/System Analyst
----- Original Message -----
From: Bonnie Cameron <bonnie.cameron@polarisind.com>
To: <MAPICS-L@midrange.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 1:47 PM
Subject: Item Master Item Types

> We often have the situation where the item type of a new part number is
> uncertain at the time of its creation. However, Mapics requires item type
> to create the new record. One of the solutions we are considering is
> writing the record with a generic, unused item type....and then
maintaining
> it later in the release process when it is confirmed.
>
> Does anyone know what ramifications we could encounter by doing this --
from
> a requirements, structure, etc. standpoint?
> Also, does anyone know the file for Item Type in Mapics and how to
maintain
> -- or is it programmatically defined?
>
> Thank you in advance for your help!
>
> Bonnie Cameron
> Polaris Industries
> 218.463.4094
> bonnie.cameron@polarisind.com
>

Dave Turbide, CFPIM, CMfgE, CIRM
Market Analysis and Communication
883 Ocean Blvd
Hampton, NH 03842
phone(603) 926-1435
fax (603) 926-0862
www.daveturbide.com


_______________________________________________
This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MAPICS-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/mapics-l
or email: MAPICS-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.