|
Barb, We did a similar thing last November. We went from a AS/400 model 500 processor 2142 to a model 270 processor 2248; this dropped us from a P20 to a P05 but the machine is 3 times faster, has double the memory and double the DASD. I believe it is the smallest 270 available from IBM. MAPICS pricing is not based on the processor group but is tied to size of the machine somehow. Our MAPICS annual maintenance went down considerably. We saw an immediate reduction in cost for annual maintenance costs of IBM Hardware, IBM software subscription, ROBOT from Help systems and from MAPICS within the first 2 months of having the machine. The savings more than paid for the cost of the "Upgrade?". The only really work involved with this process was going from v4.4 to v5.1 of OS/400 and making sure we got all of the new license codes installed properly. By the way our affiliate had to contact MAPICS to get the new pricing because the software they use to calculate the new prices did not work when you are "Downsizing" the system. Our users are extremely happy with the performance of the new system and the CEO is still talking about the amount of savings we experienced. Hope this helps. Regards, Jon Le Roi Director of Information Systems Tegal Corporation -----Original Message----- From: Barb Nash [mailto:Barb.Nash@phbcorp.com] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:22 PM To: mapics-l@midrange.com Subject: AS/400 Upgrade charges Hi all, I apologize if I am revisiting an old topic, but have searched through the archives and did not find a definite answer. In the near future we are looking to put several non-MAPICS applications/files on our AS/400. It is a 9402-400, 2131, in the P10 processor group, CPW 20.6, memory and DASD maxed out (don't laugh). Current response time during prime working hours, running MAPICS only, is fair to poor. I'm afraid that adding these additional systems is going to bring it to its knees. That being said, and economic conditions being the way they are, we need to avoid the hefty MAPICS upgrade charges if we want a new box (we are still on tiered pricing). Are these upgrade charges processor group based? Is it possible to stay in the P10 group, avoid the charges and get something with more oomph? Or better yet, move to the P05 group and lower our incredibly high ALF's and still increase our CPW? There are no plans to add or change any our MAPICS applications. Why should have to pay software charges to upgrade our hardware? Thanks in advance! Barb Nash PHB, Inc. Fairview, PA (814) 474-1552 ext. 225 Barb.nash@phbcorp.com _______________________________________________ This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list To post a message email: MAPICS-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/mapics-l or email: MAPICS-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.