RE: Implement in stages or not?

We "crash converted" from a System36 MAPICS II to an AS/400 MAPICS XAR4, it
took a looooonnnngggggg time. It about killed me ;-), but it was nice once
it was done (or is it really done?). Not that I would advise anyone to do
that. If you have the option, I would do it in stages.

Bob Randall
Airxcel, Inc.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-mapics-l@midrange.com [mailto:owner-mapics-l@midrange.com]On
> Behalf Of Theodore Vollrath
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 1999 7:25 AM
> To: MAPICS-L@midrange.com
> Subject: Implement in stages or not?
>
>
> Thanks for your responses on the MAPICS browser. It was very helpful. We
> were talking about today implementing MAPICS in stages or at once. We are
> currently running MRP on our old system and plan to implement IFM, COM,
> EPDM, MPSP, MRP, PC&C, PM&C, & PUR. Does it make sense to implement all at
> once or in stages. MFG & Engineering first, then COM & IFM last.
> My thought
> was to start with the G/L part of IFM first, then COM (and A/R), then MFG
> and Engineering (with A/P). What do you think?
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> +---
> | This is the MAPICS Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MAPICS-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MAPICS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAPICS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
> dshaw1@infoave.com
> +---
>


+---
| This is the MAPICS Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MAPICS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MAPICS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAPICS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: dshaw1@infoave.com
+---