Implement in stages or not? -- MAPICS-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Thanks for your responses on the MAPICS browser. It was very helpful. We
were talking about today implementing MAPICS in stages or at once. We are
currently running MRP on our old system and plan to implement IFM, COM,
EPDM, MPSP, MRP, PC&C, PM&C, & PUR. Does it make sense to implement all at
once or in stages. MFG & Engineering first, then COM & IFM last. My thought
was to start with the G/L part of IFM first, then COM (and A/R), then MFG
and Engineering (with A/P). What do you think?

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
+---
| This is the MAPICS Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MAPICS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MAPICS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAPICS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: dshaw1@infoave.com
+---

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.