×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
I have often wondered why a third party doesn't build a faster equivalent to
IBM Systems Director Navigator (and DCM, and, and, and...). I would be
willing to bet they could get bought out by IBM eventually. If I was more
in tune with IBM i admin duties I would attempt such an effort, but that is
not a mindset I hold.
They try to build interfaces that are desktop agnostic but it ends up
performing so slowly that people end up going back to the familiar
interfaces. Requiring Windows to even get a new IBM i up and running is
another on my pet peeve list - silly really that IBM can't address that.
Aaron Bartell
http://mowyourlawn.com
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Scott Klement <bsd4i@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
Honestly, iNav isn't exactly a stellar performer either. Nor is WDSC
for that matter. (Granted, it's better than the web crap they put out,
but it's still not great.)
Why is it whenever IBM writes software that's not green-screen, it
always performs poorly??
Sorry for sounding negative, but this has bothered me for AGES now...
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
