James Rich wrote:

> I've also been working on organizing the source a little better.  I see
> a few benefits from doing so:  old source is moved out (like the slang
> interface), the code that builds lib5250 vs. the other executables is
> better distinguished, the various executables and library may all be
> built independantly of each other, and builds for external projects like
> x5250 are simplified.

This sounds great.  I don't think I have much preference for one layout
over the other.  Your first proposal looks like the modularisation for
X, which has had a lot of thought put into it, so it's probably better.

I've got a couple of smaller changes that I'd like to get checked in and
into a Debian package for work.  Can you hold off on making a big change
for a few days until I'm done?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2021 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.