Re: [LINUX5250] Re: win32 update

[James Rich <james@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Carey Evans wrote:

> Not really, I think you've covered it.  I tend to agree that we'd be best to 
> create a Python + GLib branch from HEAD for anyone that's interested in the 
> future, then move development from b0-16 to HEAD according to what people are 
> actually working on.
>
> There's a lot that can be done with just the standard C library, with 
> autoconf to discover differences between platforms.
>
> As far as future development goes, I believe we'd get more done without 
> trying to do parallel development of stable and unstable.  Make and test the 
> changes, then announce a stable release once it works well.

So is it decided then?  Can I start removing glib references in cvs HEAD? 
I don't know how to branch cvs.  If we are decided can someone make a 
branch that matches current cvs and then I'll start making the changes to 
cvs HEAD?

James Rich

It's not the software that's free; it's you.
        - billyskank on Groklaw