|
Thanks, that was instructive. With a road map like this it's never going to be 1.0. As long as it is working, I don't mind that much. :) Marc-Antoine Ruel > -----Message d'origine----- > DeÂ: linux5250-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux5250- > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Scott Klement > EnvoyÃÂ: 25 fÃvrier, 2005 15:15 > ÃÂ: Linux 5250 Development Project > ObjetÂ: RE: [LINUX5250] win32 update > > > > > > - go the 1.0 :) I hate 0.x version numbers :) > > > > Regarding the version numbers. Here's a link to a very old thread that > discussed what the versions were supposed to entail (it changed a bit > later on, though) and also discussed what goals were intended to be met > before we called it 1.0. > > http://archive.midrange.com/linux5250/199910/msg00034.html > > Please click "thread index" at the top of the message, and then click on > the other messages in the thread so can see what the responses were. > > > -- > This is the Linux 5250 Development Project (LINUX5250) mailing list > To post a message email: LINUX5250@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/linux5250 > or email: LINUX5250-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/linux5250.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.