RE: Re: Re: Tn5250 for Windows Memory Leak -- LINUX5250

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: [LINUX5250] Re: Re: Tn5250 for Windows Memory Leak
From: Scott Klement <klemscot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:42:10 -0600 (CST)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/linux5250>
List-help: <mailto:linux5250-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Linux 5250 Development Project <linux5250.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:linux5250@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/linux5250>, <mailto:linux5250-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/linux5250>, <mailto:linux5250-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Try supplying +ruler in your tn5250rc file, and then see if the size gets
larger...

Buck & Chris have already verified (off-list) that the problem appears to
be with +ruler.

On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Sean Porterfield wrote:
>
> Mine didn't change either.  But which is bigger: 3920 or 3808?  Looks to me
> like memory usage went down unless your wording doesn't match your
> printscreen...
>

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Re: Re: Tn5250 for Windows Memory Leak , Sean Porterfield

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.