|
Doesn't SSH have stronger encryption than SSL? Ah just jumping in, was curious. :) -----Original Message----- From: linux5250-admin@midrange.com [mailto:linux5250-admin@midrange.com] On Behalf Of Scott Klement Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 11:28 AM To: linux5250@midrange.com Subject: RE: [LINUX5250] Native Telnet to another AS/400 using SSL What would be the advantage of using SSH instead of SSL-enabled telnet? The only thing I can think of is file transfer... the iSeries supports SSL-enabled FTP, but clients that do that are hard to find... On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, James Rich wrote: > > You could bug IBM or someone to port ssh to the iSeries. The lack of ssh > on a server class system is inexcusable (and I wish I had the time/skill > to do the port myself). > _______________________________________________ This is the Linux 5250 Development Project (LINUX5250) mailing list To post a message email: LINUX5250@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/linux5250 or email: LINUX5250-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/linux5250.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.