Doesn't SSH have stronger encryption than SSL?  Ah just jumping in, was
curious. :)

-----Original Message-----
From: linux5250-admin@midrange.com [mailto:linux5250-admin@midrange.com]
On Behalf Of Scott Klement
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 11:28 AM
To: linux5250@midrange.com
Subject: RE: [LINUX5250] Native Telnet to another AS/400 using SSL


What would be the advantage of using SSH instead of SSL-enabled telnet?

The only thing I can think of is file transfer...  the iSeries supports
SSL-enabled FTP, but clients that do that are hard to find...

On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, James Rich wrote:
>
> You could bug IBM or someone to port ssh to the iSeries.  The lack of
ssh
> on a server class system is inexcusable (and I wish I had the
time/skill
> to do the port myself).
>

_______________________________________________
This is the Linux 5250 Development Project (LINUX5250) mailing list
To post a message email: LINUX5250@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/linux5250
or email: LINUX5250-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/linux5250.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2021 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.