Re: License is a non-issue? -- LINUX5250

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: [LINUX5250] License is a non-issue?
From: James Rich <james@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 12:50:37 -0700 (MST)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/linux5250/>
List-help: <mailto:linux5250-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Linux 5250 Development Project <linux5250.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:linux5250@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/linux5250>,<mailto:linux5250-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/linux5250>,<mailto:linux5250-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Scott Klement wrote:

> Can you use the LGPL for non-libraries?  The word "library" seems to be
> used throughout the text of the license.

LGPL now stands for the Lesser GNU Public License.  It is not library
specific.  Though I am voting (if it counts) that the libraries
(libtn5250.so) be LGPL and the applications (tn5250, lp5250d) be GPL.

James Rich
james@eaerich.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: License is a non-issue? , Scott Klement

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.