|
On Thu, 2002-02-07 at 00:42, Jay 'Eraserhead' Felice wrote: > I'm surprised lp5250d.c and scs2ascii.c are not on the list. Basically the > idea was to put the library source under LGPL but the actual programs under > GPL. I think this would be ideal. It needs to be easy to ship binaries without violating any licenses. http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/aix/products/aixos/linux/download.html I'd like to see tn5250 on that list some day, not to mention that some Linux distributions (SuSE for iSeries) already ship it (I believe). Would it be possible to get agreement from everyone to switch to the above licensing scheme? I'd be willing to mod the RPM .spec file so that libtn5250 and tn5250 packages are generated separately, if needed. -- Steve Fox IBM Linux Technology Center http://www.ibm.com/linux/ltc http://k-lug.org
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
