|
> > I assume you are talking about the lower layers? > > I think I should have thought about it a bit more before sending that > off. It doesn't really make that much difference. > > However, I've been fortunate enough to work on SNA communications > between an AS/400 and a DOS PC. Part of the protocol stack used (SNA? > LU 6.2?) sends and receives the data in specified size packets, not > as a bytestream like TCP. I see what you mean. LU 6.2 has record bounderies that the programmer is aware of that you don't see in TCP. What I thought you meant was that SNA was a connectionless protocol, which obviously it is not. Mike +--- | This is the LINUX5250 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to LINUX5250@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to LINUX5250-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to LINUX5250-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.