Sorry for the late response
I will take a look at wrkjvmjob

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: JAVA400-L [mailto:java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Pete Helgren
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:48 PM
To: Java Programming on and around the IBM i
Subject: Re: Java performance qshell javac

Maybe take a look at wrkjvmjob and compare JVM arguments and environment
settings?

Pete Helgren
www.petesworkshop.com
GIAC Secure Software Programmer-Java
AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner
Microsoft Certified: Azure Fundamentals
Twitter - Sys_i_Geek IBM_i_Geek

On 1/20/2022 1:22 PM, John Allen wrote:
They are both running java 1.8.0 32 bit

Thanks for the suggestion

John
--
This is the Java Programming on and around the IBM i (JAVA400-L) mailing
list To post a message email: JAVA400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
or email: JAVA400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
https://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: https://amazon.midrange.com


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.