Sorry about the slow response.
Thanks for your thoughts


-----Original Message-----
From: JAVA400-L [mailto:java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 2:22 PM
To: java400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Java performance qshell javac


I would think, that the CL variant wouldn't help, it will make up new qsh
sessions and startup the JVM from scratch. I would recommend to run the java
process on some linux or windows box to get an estimate, on as400 you should
reach better performance, if you could use an already started jvm (and
scalability would be nearly unlimited). Encrypting a file would be dependant
on the size of the file and some seconds might be fast, or very slow.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.