Re: Has anybody seen this joblog message before?

TommyLooks like the std msg for a Java PGM job log. When I submit a java pgm on an Iseries with the RUNJAVA or JAVA command I usually qualify the job name just to make tracking easier. 
You are correct on the '.' meaning the current dir in IFS
 V/RSteve Hawkins FDC Support 

--- On Fri, 6/15/12, Tommy.Holden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <Tommy.Holden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Tommy.Holden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <Tommy.Holden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Has anybody seen this joblog message before?
To: "Java Programming on and around the IBM i" <java400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, June 15, 2012, 7:57 PM

Just a WAG but '.' indicates the current directory when in the IFS...


Thanks,
Tommy Holden



From:   James Lampert <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:     Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400
<java400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date:   06/15/2012 07:55 PM
Subject:        Has anybody seen this joblog message before?
Sent by:        java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx



Has anybody ever seen this, in a QP0ZSPWP job? We're attempting to start
Tomcat on a customer box, and it's throwing a .

MSGID   . . . SEV . . . FROM PGM     LIBRARY   TO PGM      LIBRARY
JVAB302 . . . 10  . . . QJVAJVMXIF   QSYS      QJVAJVMXIF  QSYS
From module . . . . . . . . :   QJVAJVMXIF

From procedure  . . . . . . :   sendMessage__10QjvaJvmXifFPcPviT1

Statement . . . . . . . . . :   10

To module . . . . . . . . . :   QJVAJVMXIF

To procedure  . . . . . . . :   check_J9_Envvar__10QjvaJvmXifFv

Statement . . . . . . . . . :   129

Thread  . . . . :   0000002E

Message . . . . :   Java Virtual Machine is IBM Technology for Java.

   PID(13635)

MSGID   . . . SEV . . . FROM PGM     LIBRARY     TO PGM      LIBRARY
JVAB529 . . . 40  . . . QJVAUTLJVM   QSYS        QJVAQSHCMD  QSYS
From module . . . . . . . . :   QJVAUTLJVM

From procedure  . . . . . . :   JvaSendMsg

Statement . . . . . . . . . :   4

To module . . . . . . . . . :   QJVAQSHCMD

To procedure  . . . . . . . :   QjvaQshCmd
Statement . . . . . . . . . :   759
Thread  . . . . :   0000002E
Message . . . . :   Public write authority on ".".

Looking at the message in QJVAMSGF, I see:

Message . . . . :   Public write authority on "&1". 
Cause . . . . . :   Directory "&2" in the classpath has public write   
   authority. If more than one class file in a directory has the same

name, the

   first one found is run. 
Recovery  . . . :   If the Classpath security check level (CHKPATH) is   

   *SECURE, the command cannot complete if a directory in the classpath

has

   public write authority. Have your administrator remove public write   
   authority from directory "&2", or change CHKPATH and run the command

again.

     If directory "&2" remains public write authority and CHKPATH is not 

   *SECURE, you may verify which classes are run by setting the OPTION   
   parameter to *VERBOSE and running the command again. 

but I can't make head or tail out of what it's trying to tell me.

--
JHHL