That actually has been discussed for future development to save on
processing speed at start up of the jvm.

Thank you all for your input.

-----Original Message-----
From: java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Charles Wilt
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 8:08 AM
To: Java Programming on and around the IBM i
Subject: Re: .jar files in use on a restore

One recommendation I've seen is to have the Java execute under a
single server (batch) job that your other jobs including interactive
ones can communicate with using data queues or sockets.

Then you could simply end the Java job and restart it.


On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Anna Abt <acosgrove@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Our software could be run either way.  That must be the case, the jvm
the lock.  I am writing a procedure for install that will monitor for that
specific case and install in a temporary folder, notifying the user what
happened.  I can't think of any other way around it and I can't control
clients are doing.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.