System i architecture vs. PC -- JAVA400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: System i architecture vs. PC
From: Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:00:07 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l>
List-help: <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 <java400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:java400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Just curious if anybody has any information/links about the System i's
architecture vs. PCs with respect to Java and the JVM.

About the only things I (think) I know:
The native 64-bit JVM is built into the MI. While the newer 32-bit
JVM runs in PASE.
Also, each job on the System i has it's own JVM. (Does that still
apply with the 32-bit JVM in PASE). How does a PC (WIndows and/or
LINUX) compare? Is there one JVM, or per process?

Thanks!
Charles

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: System i architecture vs. PC , Loyd Goodbar

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.