×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




You're right. I just checked the source and the DSPFFD and DSPFD
commands are used in this class:
AS400FileRecordDescriptionImplRemote.java

In your case since you have a connection object for each thread I think
you're actually just fine. If this was an issue I don't think IBM would
have used DSPFFD/DSPFD. I'm just surprised they didn't use the Api's to
get this info. DSPFFD/DSPFD is a quick and dirty in my opinion :-)

What you're seeing in the log is most likely an OS/400 warning about the
non-thread safe nature of the DSPFFD/DSPFD commands.

Might be worth a quick scan of the JTOpen forums, but I think you're OK.


Regards,
Richard Schoen
RJS Software Systems Inc.
"Get the information you need. Now!"
Document Management, Workflow, Report Delivery, Forms and Business
Intelligence
Email: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web Site: http://www.rjssoftware.com
Tel: (952) 736-5800
Fax: (952) 736-5801
Toll Free: (888) RJSSOFT

------------------------------

message: 4
date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 19:43:34 -0000
from: "Neill Harper" <neill.harper@xxxxxxxx>
subject: RE: RecordFormat threadsafety (Neill Harper)

Hi Richard

I think the AS400FileRecordDescription object uses the DSPFD and DSPFFD
commands to build the record format objects.

Thanks

Neill



This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.