|
I feel the same way on this point. I built the case for WDSCi in ourWhat are you burned by??? RDi costs the same as ADTS. You can have
shop. Now I feel burned by IBM and doubt that I will push for any new
IBM technologies in the future.
Our shop doesn't do Java. We're mostly OPM COBOL and CL when it comes
the iSeries, and many of the senior developers chose to stay with the
ADTS tools. So, when it comes to deciding which set of tools we'll
license, there's a good chance we'll license ADTS OPM.
This may be one more step the death of the of the iSeries in my shop.
When we've needed to modernize applications, we've tended to do so by
moving applications off the iSeries and onto Windows platforms. Now,
if we go back to ADTS OPM, modernization on the iSeries will be
completely dead in our shop, ensuring that we will eventually be
moving away from the iSeries.
But hey, who am I to question IBM?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.