Re: [WDSCI-L] MCH0802: Can I avoid that? -- JAVA400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] MCH0802: Can I avoid that?
From: Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <thunderaxiom@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:27:49 +0200
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l>
List-help: <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 <java400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:java400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Bob P. Roche skrev den 25-10-2007 20:03:

I would try a third option first. You said you were told to call the *pgm, ask that person, what you should use for your arguments, They should have told you to then if they didn't meet the standard parms.

Yes and I will that too, but the question of analyzing an existing object without having the source code available is still open. Internally we do not know how to get that information at runtime, so I was wondering if others did.
Thanks in advance,

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.