RE: Optimizing Native Java -- JAVA400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: Optimizing Native Java
From: "Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:06:05 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l>
List-help: <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 <java400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:java400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

From: Wilt, Charles

Aaron,

Joe mentions that CRTJVAPGM may not have been the way to go.

As far as giving the java process it's own memory...

AFAIK, that's done just like you would with any other i5 job.

Create a subsystem with it's own private pool for the job to run in.


Yup, this is the answer.  A dedicated subsystem means the memory won't get
swapped, which is hugely important to Java.

Joe

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.