Re: Data queue performance question -- JAVA400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Data queue performance question
From: Jim Oberholtzer <JOberholtzer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 12:10:43 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l>
List-help: <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 <java400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:java400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

<snip>
Is there anything inherently inefficient using a data queue in this
manner?  Would it be better to use multiple data queue's (one for host
to java another for java to host)?
</snip>

David:

Data queues were designed for just that type of application and in fact 
are the fastest ways to accomplish what you are after doing.  A data queue 
is really  a special type of user queue but meant for data.  IBM uses them 
all over internally because of the API support and the inherent speed.

Jim

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.