× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



    Hi Walden,

    I personally would try to use standard messaging with JMS because that
fits in with my commonly used strategy and I can expect it to be around
regardless of JSR 286 solutions.  Below are some links for other
possibilities.


Sharing information between IBM portlets and JSR 168 portlets with WebSphere
Portal V5.1
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/library/techarticles/0602_hepper/0602_hepper.html


A JSR168-compliant implementation of inter-portlet communication
http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~mo197/portlets/portlet_messaging/


Inter-Portlet Communications
http://websphere.sys-con.com/read/118322.htm


HTH,


                                                         Joe Sam

Joe Sam Shirah -        http://www.conceptgo.com
conceptGO       -        Consulting/Development/Outsourcing
Java Filter Forum:       http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/
Just the JDBC FAQs: http://www.jguru.com/faq/JDBC
Going International?    http://www.jguru.com/faq/I18N
Que Java400?            http://www.jguru.com/faq/Java400


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Walden H. Leverich" <WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400"
<java400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 10:33 AM
Subject: Inter-Portlet communication, WebSphere Portal and JSR168


> OK, it appears that Inter-Portlet Communication (IPC) is something that
> was, for the most part, left out of JSR168. Sure, 168 allows for
> application scope "session" variables, but that's only useful for
> portlets in the same application (WAR). So... What's the preferred
> method of communication between portlets in Websphere Portal using
> 168-compliant portlets?
>
> This is for a corporate "dash-board" style portal, not an open
> free-for-all yahoo style portal, so I'm not hung up about the concept
> that portlets should be independent entities. Click to action seems like
> old technology, yes? Is it broad-cast messages? Where do I find
> information on these?
>
> Thanks,
> -Walden
>
> ------------
> Walden H Leverich III
> Tech Software
> (516) 627-3800 x3051
> WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.TechSoftInc.com
> <blocked::blocked::http://www.techsoftinc.com/>
>
> Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
> (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
>
>
> -- 
> This is the Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 (JAVA400-L)
mailing list
> To post a message email: JAVA400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
> or email: JAVA400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.
>


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.