|
Renato, I'm not sure why you're getting the lock, however there is a logic error in your program. Even at an isolation level of Repeatable Read (RR), which is the highest isolation level, there is _no_ guarantee that another process can't read the same row you've just read. If your task reads the current id number and then gets swapped out, another task can also read the current id number, then you and the other task will both think you have the highest number and, in technical terms, BOOM. You need to turn the read/update ordering around. Do the update first, then read the row to find out what the new currentID is, and return that. For example: BEGIN SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL REPEATABLE READ; UPDATE libtest.idtable SET id = id + 1 WHERE tbname = table_name; SELECT id INTO next_id FROM libtest.idtable WHERE tbname = table_name; COMMIT WORK; END Oh, and I would point out the evils of hard coding library names into procs. When you move from test to production you'll have to change this code from libtest. To libprod. (or whatever) Hope you're not public -- that would make the auditors oh so happy. <G> -Walden ------------ Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.