RE: Vector of a vector?

[<SRamanujan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Joe.

I just read the documentation and the difference is the Vector is
synchronized and ArrayList is not and for multi threaded environment,
you can write a synchronized wrap around as:
List list = Collections.synchronizedList(new ArrayList());
(This decreases the performance slightly.)  
Thanks,
Sudha

Sudha Ramanujan
SunGard Futures Systems
sramanujan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(312) 577 6179
(312) 577 6101 - Fax


-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Pluta [mailto:joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 4:02 PM
To: 'Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400'
Subject: RE: Vector of a vector?

Sudha, I'm pretty sure Vector will always be supported.  I see nothing
in any of the documentation suggesting it is deprecated.  Thus, any
application server will always support a Vector.  However, the ArrayList
class is easier to use and might even have some performance benefits;
the only problem is that the ArrayList is not available prior to Java
version 1.2.  Older JDKs will not support it.

Joe

> From: SRamanujan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> I am not sure if a vector is better.  I think the vector and ArrayList
> works the same way where the elements are added and removed.  But a
> Vector implementation may not be supported in all the application
> servers reducing the portablity.  So it is usually recommended to use
an
> ArrayList more so, a List, which can be implemented as an ArrayList.

-- 
This is the Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400
(JAVA400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: JAVA400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
or email: JAVA400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.