|
java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 07/27/2004 02:53:25 PM: > > I obviously do not know all of your business requirements so it is hard to > pass judgement, but I think you are heading down the wrong path. My > primary concern, is that I think it is a mistake to allow the clients to > talk directly to the server. Even if you use Swing, I would recommend > that the client talk only to the application server over HTTP/HTTPS and > that the server then execute the business logic (JDBC, program calls > etc..) Otherwise, I think you are opening up a lot of potential security > and deployment issues. > I just re-read this and wanted to clarify something. If someone were to say they were going to write a fat client Swing app (which is essentially what you are saying) that uses jt400 to run JDBC and ProgramCalls, I would not have any specific concerns about that. I think all of the technical pieces are fairly sound. This is more or less what we are doing in our applications, we are just using Eclipse/SWT instead of Swing for the framework. It is just that since you specifically talk about delivering it via a browser, it implies that this application has reach that extends outside of your internal network, or at least could someday. In that scenario, I think you would be better off if you only let the client and server communicate via HTTP/HTTPS. Mark
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.