RE: framework question -- JAVA400-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: RE: framework question
From: "Bartell, Aaron L. (TC)" <ALBartell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 08:53:43 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l>
List-help: <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 <java400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:java400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Joe, I am just trying to counter your quick reply's that RPG is as elegant
in the namespace arena as Java.  I am trying to get facts, not off the cuff
opinions, because our shop is making serious considerations of moving to
Java (for where it fits).  Every time you respond I get a blanket statement
and if I don't dig into it I don't get what you really think.

>From the small amount of Java I have done and the large amount of RPG
*SrvPgms, I can say that the two do not have even close to the same
"namespace" concept.


Aaron Bartell

Follow-Ups:

RE: framework question , Joe Pluta

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.