×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




Hi,

its locked, but allows shre read and might run in conflict with another 
transaction trying the same thing. you get a higher lock with a pseudo update 
under commit
update ... set somefield = somefield where ...

Dieter Bender

On Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2004 17:36, Glenn Holmer wrote:
> This question is about code that runs on an AS/400 in a program
> that acts as an RMI server.  The method is not synchronized.
> With this code:
>
> stmt = conn.createStatement(ResultSet.TYPE_SCROLL_SENSITIVE,
>                             ResultSet.CONCUR_UPDATABLE);
> sqlStmt = "SELECT WIPNO, LOWEST, HIGHEST "
>         + "FROM WMSLIB.SERIALNO "
>         + "WHERE WIPNO = '" + wipNo + "' FOR UPDATE";
> rs = stmt.executeQuery(sqlStmt);
>
> am I guaranteed (by using "FOR UPDATE") that the record I read
> will be locked until it is either written back or the result set
> is closed?  If not, how can I achieve this?

-- 
mfG

Dieter Bender


DV-Beratung Dieter Bender
Wetzlarerstr. 25
35435 Wettenberg
Tel. +49 641 9805855
Fax +49 641 9805856
www.bender-dv.de
eMail dieter.bender@xxxxxxxxxxxx


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.