RE: JDBC version vs JDK -- JAVA400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: JDBC version vs JDK
From: "David Morris" <David.Morris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 11:02:59 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l>
List-help: <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400<java400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:java400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>,<mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>,<mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

No, just DB2SavePoint. I will forward the whole thing to you directly.

David Morris

>>> garyp@xxxxxxxxxxxx 8/15/2003 10:02:59 AM >>>
Just one more question before I ask my friend to open a PMR.  In your
-verbose logging, do you see a load for java.sql.Savepoint?

Thanks,
Gary

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: JDBC version vs JDK , Gary L Peskin

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.