|
Shannon, >And I also feel, again, that IBM didn't do AS/400 programmers any favor by hiding the complexity of the nitty gritty of programming behind so much in RPG. For example, a CHAIN in RPG is easy. Setting up an input stream, reading bytes of data from a file, etc...piece by piece, the way you have to do it in other languages such as Java, is so much more complex by comparison. AS/400 programmers have not had to deal with that complexity, they simply execute a CHAIN. And because of that, when they want to move to/try a new language, there's a tremendous learning curve. It would have been easier to learn it all from the beginning. You should be THANKING IBM, not chastising them. Just because other languages try to be so general purpose that they make it difficult to do everyday business functions doesn't mean that the language that was designed for business processing is bad!! It's interesting that even the most staunch OO advocates seem to be against the encapsulation given by the RPG opcodes, yet have no problem with the concept of processing I/O in bytestream format... -mark -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.