|
> From: Mihael Knezevic > > i know cause i use eclipse on my linux box and it's great. That's why I'm learning SWT - I want to work with Eclipse. > but i think > that with swt you have another dependency and another library you have > to add to the class path and another file on the disk and one you have > to additionaly distribute with your apps. and of course more classes and > methods you have to know about. True. But in these days of large applications, one more file is hardly an issue. I wish it weren't so, of course, but there really was no other way to do what they were trying to do. > that is enough for me to say no. there is allready so much to learn and > to know about and swt is one thing i don't necessarily need. the > standard works just fine for me. (just my 2 cents) > > but that has everyone to decide for himself. Yes indeed. But if you plan on ever writing tools that work WITH Eclipse, you'll need to learn SWT. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.