× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



    With no intent to flame, I have never understood why so many people
delight in running down cycle programming.  While I'm sure you are the
exception, many of them, when you can pin them down, have no idea how it
really works.  I often also hear the same sort of thing in reverse re Java
vs RPG, C or other languages.

    I try to use the best tool for the job.  For many batch and reporting
tasks that naturally fall into a detail/summary hierarchy, like corp,
division, cost center, dept, it is very difficult to beat RPG cycle
programming with control breaks instead of continually rolling your own.

    But this is a Java Language mailing list, so I'm heading back to writing
an EJB tutorial for devWorks' Java zone.  Be nice if Java had a control
break driven report writer...    ;-)


                                                        Joe Sam

Joe Sam Shirah
conceptGO         -        Consulting/Development/Outsourcing
Java Filter Forum:       http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/
Just the JDBC FAQs: http://www.jguru.com/faq/JDBC
Going International?    http://www.jguru.com/faq/I18N
Qué Java400?             http://www.jguru.com/faq/Java400



----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Paris" <Jon.Paris@partner400.com>
To: <java400-l@midrange.com>
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 1:59 PM
Subject: java to RPG problem


> >> RPG has a useful feature: where most languages have to walk through
> files, RPG can ride around on its logic cycle.
>
> Now I know what a sweet old fashioned boy you are!!  Logic cycle - what's
> the logic cycle?  That's really funny - I've been back coding RPG (after a
> period with PL/I, COBOL and others) for about 15 years now and in all that
> time have only coded one (1) cycle program.  Only reason for that one was
> that IBM wanted the same basic code to be able to run on S/370, S/34 and
> S/36 and .....
>
>
> Jon Paris
> Partner400
>
>






As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.