|
It depends on what do you want to do with XML. I think JDOM is less powerful than DOM APIs although it is easier to use. I heard that JDOM would also become part of standard JDK. Not sure if this is true. Bruce ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Morris" <David.Morris@plumcreek.com> To: <java400-l@midrange.com> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 9:37 AM Subject: Re: More on XML Parsers > Mike, > > It really depends on what you are doing with the parser. I > would certainly use JDOM if it meets your needs. JDOM also > needs a parser and I would use Xerces 2.0.1 if it is an option. > JDOM is still beta but pretty stable and it really simplifies working > with XML documents in Java. > > David Morris > > >>> msilvers@HBS-INC.COM 06/07/02 09:54AM >>> > Thanks for the responses about the Xerces parser. We are trying to > decide > on which parser to use for a project. Is anyone using the Sun JAXP > Parser > on their 400? Any problems with it? Any other parser suggestions? > > Thanks again! > > Mike > _______________________________________________ > This is the Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 (JAVA400-L) mailing list > To post a message email: JAVA400-L@midrange.com > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/java400-l > or email: JAVA400-L-request@midrange.com > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l. > >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.