Re: More on XML Parsers -- JAVA400-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: More on XML Parsers
From: "David Morris" <David.Morris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 10:37:08 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l/>
List-help: <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 <java400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:java400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/java400-l>,<mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/java400-l>,<mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Mike,

It really depends on what you are doing with the parser. I
would certainly use JDOM if it meets your needs. JDOM also
needs a parser and I would use Xerces 2.0.1 if it is an option.
JDOM is still beta but pretty stable and it really simplifies working
with XML documents in Java.

David Morris

>>> msilvers@HBS-INC.COM 06/07/02 09:54AM >>>
Thanks for the responses about the Xerces parser.  We are trying to
decide
on which parser to use for a project.  Is anyone using the Sun JAXP
Parser
on their 400?  Any problems with it?  Any other parser suggestions?

Thanks again!

Mike

Follow-Ups:

Re: More on XML Parsers , Bruce Jin

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.