× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Exactly my thoughts... What I was thinking is that if I accessed the instance 
variables directly, when I needed to add
some validation (or some other code), I'd have to retrofit those accesses to 
use the getter/setter methods...

How much overhead does using getter/setter methods (for that matter, any 
classes) incur? Not sure how much work the JVM
has to do to get to the code, especially if the class has already been 
instantiated.  I assume the JVM has to work
harder (I/O, linkage issues) if the class is located somewhere else (different 
package, for example).

Anyone have some field experience here???

thanks

dan



-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Langston [mailto:jlangston@celsinc.com]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 2:01 PM
To: 'java400-l@midrange.com'
Subject: RE: Java Style Question

<snip>

If, on the other hand, there was validity checking in the Set method then I
would use the Set method instead if I wanted that validity checking in the
method I was coding.
<snip>


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.