Re: SQL7008 -- JDBC file needs to be journaled???

["Dave Wall" <dawall@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I totally agree backward compatibility is important!  We break backward
compatibility only when there is no other way to achieve the best outcome
(very rare).  I am still looking through old code, documents, etc., trying
to find out why this was changed.  The developer that made the change no
longer works for IBM and didn't leave a lot of documentation in this area
so I may not have much luck.  I am also sending him e-mail to see if he
remembers why he made the change.  I will post if/when I find out more.

David Wall
AS/400 Toolbox for Java




                      David Gibbs
                      <david@midrange.c        To:       java400-l@midrange.com
                      om>                      cc:
                      Sent by:                 Subject:  Re: SQL7008 -- JDBC 
file needs to be journaled???
                      java400-l-admin@m
                      idrange.com


                      01/21/2002 05:54
                      PM
                      Please respond to
                      java400-l





At 04:22 PM 1/21/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>Try adding ";translation isolation=none" to the end of your JDBC URL.  The
>default changed from none to read_uncommitted in v4r4.

Whatever happened to "Backwards Compatibility"????

Come on, this is an AS400 we're talking about.

david


_______________________________________________
This is the Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 (JAVA400-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: JAVA400-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/java400-l
or email: JAVA400-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.