|
>No doubt [connection pooling] should be handled by the Java environment, IMHO, and >probably will one day. Check out WebSphere. I lose track of all the distinctions involved between the various levels of the product (since I don't have to pay for it ;-) ), but I think you'll find connection pooling is available in WebSphere and probably at all levels of it. As long as your application is sufficiently simple, writing your own "pooling" function is not terribly difficult. Certainly, to prototype things while running in Microsoft land, it probably can be made to work well enough for the pre-OS/400 testing. If you like WebSphere, you can probably pre-plan so you can encapsulate a quick-and-dirty version for basic test before the migration. I still suspect you're going to find that you have a problem with the Order(N something) effect sooner or later, probably when you scale it up (unless I've misunderstood your description). As for the DB versus Table terminology thing, "it's a fair cop" as the British put it. Too many years on OS/400. Larry W. Loen - Senior Linux, Java, and iSeries Performance Analyst Dept HP4, Rochester MN
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.