|
Chris, The only case I can think of where an indication of records provides value is when some pre-processing is done when you find a record. It should be easy to condition that processing in the loop you process your result set in. However, it is usually better to provide some sort of interface that wraps your result set. That helps decouple the application from the database implementation. It also provides a place that you can code that empty set indicator logic. David Morris >>> chris_price@nsb.co.uk 11/27/01 07:34AM >>> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Thanks for the answer Dan. The "problem" I have with using next() to determine if a record set is empty , is that it moves the file pointer (oops - betraying my RPG origins now) I mean cursor, so the result set is changed. I know I can move it back again, but this seems a bit sloppy to me, hence my post. The problem may well of course be mine, I'm that I'm still thinking like an RPG programmer and want to know why I can't have my file indicators back....(VBG) Chris
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.