× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Joe,

I would tend to agree that both data queues and result sets have their place.  
One
thing I have found with data queues is that both of these impose a lot of 
overhead.
I took an application we had and converted from a result set to get around some
limitations to a data queue.  The performance got worse, but it got around the 
problem.
Next, I converted that same application to use http tunneling and the 
performance
improvement was very noticeable.  Since then, I know that data queues have been
worked on.  Do you know if the performance problems have been fixed?  I have a
project coming up I would like to use data queues on, but I am a apprehensive.

David Morris

>>> joepluta@PlutaBrothers.com 08/30/01 04:08PM >>>

...No, I think you're trying to defend stored procedures vs. data queues.  Me,
I admit that stored procedures may be very good for simple queries and even
simple updates, but that data queues are much better for more sophisticated
transaction requirements.  I've stated why.  I'd be interested to see your
response.,,,



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.