|
I disagree. One problem that is becoming more and more common in our industry is that people seem to think opinions are as good as fact when it come to making architectural decisions, and that "easier" is synonymous with "better". The truth of the matter is that there are correct and incorrect approaches to each decision, and only a realistic understanding of the pros and cons will allow good choices. To say "Stored Procedures is simpler" is very simplistic and, in many cases, wrong. I'm trying to point out to anyone who may be reading this that for certain operations, other architectures are better, and why that is. I think these discussions are crucial, lest we find ourselves with an industry crippled with bloated Lotus Notes applications and unmaintainable EJB/SQL "solutions". Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: Clapham, Paul > > > This sounds like one of those "Is bread better than cheese" debates. They > get tiresome quickly, I find.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact copyright@midrange.com.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.