|
Eric Merritt wrote: >Joe, > Its true that this is unneeded, but it has been my >experience that this vastly improves the readability >of your code This reminds me of an age-old habit. I tend to use parenthesis, whether I need them or not, on a lot of expressions like: a = b + c * d; Not only are there languages in the world (APL and Pascal to name two I know) that don't evaluate this in the same way C and Java do, there remains the question not only "does the programmer remember the precedence rules" but also "did he really intend to rely on precedence, or did he leave out the parenthesis he needed". I say "he" here because "he" is usually "me" when I puzzle over code I wrote a few years back. So, while I usually don't do it for a few cases (-> in C, . in Java) I tend to use a lot more parenthesis than actually required so that I know, explicitly, what I was trying to do three years later. Larry W. Loen - Senior Java and AS/400 Performance Analyst Dept HP4, Rochester MN +--- | This is the JAVA/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: joe@zappie.net +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.