× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. JAVA400-L
  3. March 2001

RE: Java and CPU

  • Subject: RE: Java and CPU
  • From: "Nathan M. Andelin" <nathanma@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 16:36:51 -0700
 
The help text on the WRKACTJOB screen describes the CPU column as follows:

"The total processing unit time used by the job, expressed in seconds."

If I have a 70 CPW machine, and Joe has a 460 CPW machine, and Brad has a
240 CPW, then I'd expect the higher CPW machines to have faster processors
and require fewer CPU seconds.  Is this assumption correct?  And can we
factor CPW into the comparison?

Thanks,

Nathan.


+---
| This is the JAVA/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: joe@zappie.net
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.