× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: URGENT !! PTFs to fix another integrity problem
  • From: "Eyers, Daniel" <daniel.eyers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 07:08:00 -0700

IMHO, providing information is what we (as IS professionals) do.  If there's
a hack out there that has an impact to our businesses, we should have access
to that information in order to combat it.  Some of the most clever hacks
ever were reduced in significance because the knowledge of the hack was
spread, and everyone knew how to protect against it.  Imagine where we would
be today if the discoverer of germs had said, "This is 'too much
information' for the masses.  We'll just tell them to wash their hands
without telling them why."  

By holding back information, one causes others to wonder who decides whether
it *is* "too much information" or if there are hidden agendas.  Johnson felt
the rising body count in Vietnam was "too much information,"  Stalin felt
that knowledge of dissidents in the fledging Soviet Union was "too much
information," and the government of China rules by limiting the flow of
information because it wants to "protect" it's citizenry from "too much
information."

Science is about exchanging information and building on someone else's work.
It's about verifying someone else's work to prove it's validity. The
Internet has opened great opportunity as a facilitator of science and human
endeavors by providing a effective, efficent platform for discourse and
exchange. *That* is the real computer revolution.

Withholding pertinant information for fear of giving "too much information"
is not only arrogant, it is counterproductive to the purpose of the
Internet.  It demonstrates a lack of understanding of basic scientific
method and belies an attitude that is not conducive to problem solving.

Just my thoughts...

dan




>>OTOH, I agree that there should not be too much information given.  IMO,
the
>>people who have posted all the details about how to use DMPSYSOBJ to see
the
>>cleartext passwords should not have done so.  That's why to all the people
>>who have emailed privately for the details, I'm saying "Sorry, you won't
get
>>them from me."


+---
| This is the JAVA/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: joe@zappie.net
+---
+---
| This is the JAVA/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: joe@zappie.net
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.