× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.





Here is a little more information on why at least one person thinks that this is
a good thing (a feature, not a bug).

I am not sure what you are getting at in your reply, Gary.  I gather that there
is a persistent connection, and the problem (if it is a problem) is in closing
the connection without closing the statements.

I am curious how other implementations handle this.  Are the connection and the
statement synchronized?  And what about Netscape's Suitespot server?





"Luther Ananda Miller" <luther.miller@HYPERE.COM> on 01/12/2000 09:49:00 AM

Please respond to JAVA400-L@midrange.com

To:   JAVA400-L@midrange.com
cc:    (bcc: Andrew Goodspeed/Atlanta/LBSS)

Subject:  Re: jdbc-IBM Connection Manager-Servlets and sql handles



> Do you see a downside to asking IBM to enhance the
> releaseIBMConnection() method to call Statement.close() on any open
> statements?

Yes! releaseIBMConnection() just puts the connection back in the pool-- the
connection is not necessarily closed at this point. It is very reasonable to
assume that some applicatoins might create a connection pool where
statements within the connections within the pool could be used more than
once. I am not sure how it would be implemented-- e.g., how would the second
user of a connection know that the statements have already been allocated?
One way might be to subclass the Connection and add some functionality for
application-specific statement management to the subclass, and let the pool
be instances of the subclass.. depending on the application at hand, this
could be a real performance booster.

Regarding the original problem of closing statements that will no longer be
used, be sure to do something like this:

// [statement opened]
try {
  // [use statement]
} finally {
  stmt.close();
}

to ensure that it will ALWAYS be closed no matter what might go wrong in
between..

Luther

> > Alex Garrison wrote:
> > We sent a sql cli trace to IBM and found out that we were running out
> > of free sql handles.  Long story short: You must call the
> > Statement.close() method when you are finished with a statement.  If


+---
| This is the JAVA/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: joe@zappie.net
+---






+---
| This is the JAVA/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: joe@zappie.net
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.