|
on 11/15/97at 10:05 AM, the Great and Grand Wazir Chris Rehm <Mr.AS400@ibm.net> said: Booth, certainly you aren't saying that Java developers must put every possible feature into version 1.0 of the JVM? Even I would have trouble coming up with every possible feature or need to match all the possible uses of a virtual machine in the future. ;-) No, that's true, I'm not. But I do want stuff that will run on 1.0 to run on 1.1, 1.7, and 2.0, though. Excepting very early obvious screwups that should be buried, I want stuff already written to keep right on working, version-after-version. If I have the newest Jave version then any java application should run on it. Different question: Why are objects called "classes"? What is the entomology? Anyone know? ---------------------------------------------------- Booth Martin --------------------------------------------------- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to "JAVA400-L@midrange.com". | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com | and specify 'unsubscribe JAVA400-L' in the body of your message. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
