|
Well the folks on IBM's AlphaWorks don't seem dso down on PHP as you are.Ah, there's no accounting for taste. Some people like .NET <grin>.
More to the point, RPG-CGI or PHP gets the box back in the game then that's what matters.Well, if RPG-CGI or PHP can keep someone on the box, then I'm not going to argue.
We both know that we'll never agree on this so I won't waste my breath.Not sure what we're not agreeing on - if it's whether PHP or RPG-CGI are technically sound approaches, you're right, we're unlikely to agree but more importantly Pete's not interested in the argument, and he runs the list. <smile>
However, we both know that technical superiority is a pointless argument - if it mattered we'd all be running on "i" with OS/2 on our desktops!Yeah, but if IBM had made more noise at the time about OS/2, we might actually be seeing that.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.