|
I am having this SQL RPGLE problem too, I was just never bothered by it enough to mention it until now. I cannot link to fields from the compile listing for the SQL RPGLE. I tried CRTSQLRPGI with DBGVIEW(*SOURCE) and OPTION(*EVENTF) and then with DBGVIEW(*NONE) and OPTION(*EVENTF). I think that answers one of the previous questions. The last discussion on this topic on this thread ended with PTF SI06000 and SI06922 already installed on our system. These were supposed to do with debug/eventf. These are still installed on our system and we are still having the problem. We are still running V5R2 and WDSC 5.0.1. When I execute the CRTSQLRPGI with OPTION(*EVENTF) and there is an error in the source, in all cases, the following happens after the compile listing shows up and I click the field in error: 1. A box pops up that says, "Object not found QSQLTEMP1". EVF2062 RC=291 on top. I click OK. Then 2. "Unexpected error opening file '<OS400>QTEMP/QSQLTEMP1(<mbr>)'" appears at the bottom of the compile listing.
The field appears under '<OS400>QTEMP/QSQLTEMP1(<mbr>)' even though that member exists in a different library and source file. My guess is that CODE/400 is reading a different QTEMP than used to create the object in batch. Why should it be using QTEMP in the first place? I then developed a theory that if I compiled interactively I would be able to get to the member in QTEMP. Sure enough, I compiled interactively and when I clicked on the field in error on the compile listing, the QTEMP member opened in CODE and I was taken to the error. I think doing this interactively is as worthless as batch anyway. Why would you want to edit a member in QTEMP? At least you can see the error. I think the problem is the fact that the member is copied to QTEMP behing the scenes and compiled from there. Why does it do that and can we get around this problem? I am getting into writing more and more SQL RPGLE programs but not being able to get to errors quickly is a big hinderance to using CODE with SQL. Especially when it is one of my top reasons for using CODE. Also, especially when IBM is pushing SQL. Does SQL RPG have the same problems? I usually don't write in RPG III but I will probably run into quite a bit of legacy SQL RPG code soon.
Thanks, Craig Strong
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.