RE: Code/400 communications quality (wasTerminalServer(citrixandcode400)

["Reeve Fritchman" <reeve@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I left the IBM web site up and the mouse behind his food bowl; the order was
all set up.  When he bumped the food bowl (Yellow Lab/Golden Retriever
cross; they attack, not bump, their food bowl), the bowl hit the mouse which
then clicked on the "Submit order" button.

There are two more doggies; since Guth-Pup's gotten me the laptop, Jake can
spring for the desktop.  Blake's off buying shoes for her mother.

I'm working on "Lab-Cam"...

-rf

> -----Original Message-----
> From: code400-l-bounces+reeve=ltl400.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:code400-l-
> bounces+reeve=ltl400.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Booth Martin
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 4:34 PM
> To: code400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Code/400 communications quality (was
TerminalServer(citrixandcode400)
> 
> I went to Staples 2 weeks ago and bought a 512 Meg stick of PC133 RAM for
> $54 + sales tax with a $20 mail-in rebate
> 
> 
> 
> You've got a good dog.  How about a photo so I can show my dog.  Mine's
> never gotten me anything as nice as a laptop.   Not that my dog isn't
> generous to a fault, but she's just not focused.
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Booth Martin   http://www.MartinVT.com
> 
> Booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> -------Original Message-------
> 
> 
> 
> From: CODE/400 Discussion & Support
> 
> Date: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 16:03:00
> 
> To: 'CODE/400 Discussion & Support'
> 
> Subject: RE: Code/400 communications quality (was Terminal
> Server(citrixandcode400)
> 
> 
> 
> Maybe my desktop memory is too expensive: I can find 128 mb (PC100, SDRAM,
> 
> ECC, unbuffered) for $50 on PCConnection. Dell claims the maximum memory
> 
> allowed is 384 mb but there are other reports of >> more working fine. The
> 
> laptop was the dogs' Xmas present to me; I'll have to think of an excuse
to
> 
> get a new desktop. My wedding anniversary, perhaps?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -reeve