× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I'm sure OS/2 and Windows handled the "X" the same way" close the
application but Windows was already out there when OS/2 came along.  I think
the performance issue is related to saving *all* the settings (because
they're probably not keeping track of which ones have changed) and in
restarting the editor, which likely requires reading all those options,
setting up internal tables, and loading the background programs.

I don't care about a longer load time (once it's open, it's open...or is
it?), so I'm not sure what they mean by "performance".  Plenty of
applications need time to close (Windows and OS/400, to name two).  Based on
the horsepower requirement for WSDC, I'd think some of this fuss about
performance is a concern of the 166 mHz days.

I wonder if an LPEX'er cares to contribute to this discussion and explain
the (ir-)rationale behind "X", performance, etc.?

-reeve

-----Original Message-----
From: code400-l-admin@midrange.com [mailto:code400-l-admin@midrange.com]On
Behalf Of vhamberg@attbi.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 6:10 PM
To: code400-l@midrange.com
Subject: RE: Code Extras

But CODE was originally an OS/2 application, IIRC, so
making it behave in Windows probably wasn't on the
horizon.

Just speculatin'

I like the performance deal, but this means they DO
intercept the Windows message to close down the app. So
they COULD save settings then, too, I think.

Vern
> Whether or not it's the right thing to do, it's not the behavior one would
> expect from a Windows application and probably should be better
documented.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: batthish@ca.ibm.com [mailto:batthish@ca.ibm.com]
> > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 8:48 AM
> > To: code400-l@midrange.com
> > Subject: RE: Code Extras
> >
> >
> > I think I need to clarify the design, since everyone seems to
> > be commenting
> > on it.
> >
> > 1) When you click the 'X', CODE Editor does not CLOSE.  The window is
> > merely hidden.  This is by design for PERFORMANCE reasons,
> > and will not be
> > changed.

-snip-
_______________________________________________
This is the CODE/400 Discussion & Support (CODE400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: CODE400-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/code400-l
or email: CODE400-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/code400-l.

NOTE: WDSc for iSeries disucssion has it's own mailing list.
Information can be found at
http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/wdsc-l




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.